Civil Disobedience Section II Summary and Analysis.
Civil Disobedience in the Arguments of Henry David Thoreau, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Socrates. Selfish Disobedience? Civil disobedience can be defined in a number of different ways: in its most raw form, “civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest.Bartleby And Civil Disobedience Essay, Research PaperThe highly simplified definition of civil noncompliance given by Webster s Dictionary is nonviolent resistance to a jurisprudence through refusal to follow with it, on evidences of scruples.Thoreau in Civil Disobedience and Martin Luther.Civil disobedience is a symbolic or ritualistic violation of the law rather than a rejection of the system as a whole. The civil disobedient, finding legitimate avenues of change blocked or nonexistent, feels obligated by a higher, extralegal principle to break some specific law. It is because acts associated with civil disobedience are considered crimes, however, and known by actor and public.
Nonviolent civil disobedience and demonstrations have failed in other non-democratic nations as well. In 1989, a protest of over a million people in Tiananmen Square, Beijing, was quickly dispersed when tanks of the People’s Liberation Army entered the square and troops began firing into the crowds.In his essay, “Civil Disobedience” Thoreau wrote in 1849 after spending a night in the Walden town jail for refusing to pay a poll tax that supported the Mexican War. He recommended passive resistance as a form of tension that could lead to reform of unjust laws practiced by the government.
Thoreau's essay Civil Disobedience or Resistance to Civil Government, published in 1849, is a call to arms similar to the stances that people like Parks and King would later take. Thoreau argued.
